• Subscribe to the AG's RSS Feed
  • Join the AG's FaceBook
  • Follow the AG on Twitter
  • View the AG's YouTube Channel
  • View the AG's Tumblr Page

Attorney General Lockyer Praises State Supreme Court Decision Upholding California Sentencing Law

Ruling Upholds State Scheme That Gives Judges Discretion To Impose Longer Terms
Monday, June 20, 2005
Contact: (415) 703-5837

(SACRAMENTO) – Attorney General Bill Lockyer issued the following statement on today's California Supreme Court decision in People v. Black, S126182, that upholds provisions of the state's determinate sentencing law that allow judges to impose longer criminal sentences based on aggravating factors.

"The court's important ruling validates a 28-year sentencing structure that has served well the criminal justice system and, more importantly, public safety. The state carefully constructed its sentencing system to protect defendants' right to a jury trial, and at the same time give judges appropriate leeway to impose longer terms when they find aggravating factors. The justices correctly determined California's laws comply with constitutional requirements and U.S. Supreme Court precedent."

The Black case has been closely watched as a key indicator of how California's Determinate Sentencing Law, enacted in 1977, would survive recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings that have constricted judges' sentencing discretion. In Blakely v. Washington, 124 S.Ct. 2531 (2004) and United States v. Booker, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005), the high court restricted judges' ability to impose longer sentences based on facts not found by a jury.

California's law requires judges to impose the middle term, unless they determine lower or upper terms are warranted based on specific mitigating or aggravating factors. In Black, the California Supreme Court said the state's system differed from the schemes struck down in Blakely and Booker because it does not require judges to find elements of a crime not presented to the jury and provides defendants notice and a jury trial on facts that allow judges to impose the upper term. The justices also upheld provisions in California law that allow judges to impose consecutive sentences when defendants are convicted of two or more crimes.

# # #

Subscriptions

Megan's Law

California Registered Sex Offender Database

Search Now

Megan's Law information is also available in these languages:

Site Navigation

Translate Website

  • Google™ Translation Disclaimer

This Google™ translation feature is provided for informational purposes only.

The Office of the Attorney General is unable to guarantee the accuracy of this translation and is therefore not liable for any inaccurate information resulting from the translation application tool.

Please consult with a translator for accuracy if you are relying on the translation or are using this site for official business.

If you have any questions please contact:Bilingual Services Program at (916) 324-5482

A copy of this disclaimer can also be found on our Disclaimer page.

Select a Language Below / Seleccione el Idioma Abajo

Close this box or use the [ X ]