• Subscribe to the AG's RSS Feed
  • Join the AG's FaceBook
  • Follow the AG on Twitter
  • View the AG's YouTube Channel
  • View the AG's Tumblr Page

States Accuse Drug-Maker Bristol of Illegal Monopoly to Protect High Prices for Cancer-Fighting Drug Taxol

Tuesday, June 4, 2002
Contact: (415) 703-5837

(SACRAMENTO) – Attorney General Bill Lockyer today joined in a multi-state antitrust complaint accusing pharmaceutical manufacturer Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc. (Bristol) of illegally keeping cheaper, generic versions of its cancer-fighting drug Taxol off the market.

"We believe Bristol abused the patent process to stifle competition and create an illegal monopoly for its cancer-fighting drug Taxol," Lockyer said. "Bristol profited by artificially controlling the marketplace and should refund these ill-gotten gains and be prevented from repeating this kind of conduct. We know the State of California was forced to pay more for cancer treatment drugs than if a cheaper, generic version of Taxol had been available to choose from."

The complaint was filed jointly in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., by Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. Ohio, Maryland and Florida are leading the multi-state action.

In 1992, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration gave Bristol five years of exclusive marketing rights for Taxol. Paclitaxel, the actual pharmaceutical ingredient in Taxol, was discovered by the National Cancer Institute and developed and tested at taxpayer expense. Paclitaxel is used in treating ovarian, breast and a variety of other cancers. In 1993, the company told a congressional committee that a patent could not be created for paclitaxel and that "near-term generic competition for Taxol is a certainty".

The antitrust complaint alleges that Bristol delayed entry of a generic version of its drug until 2000 by fraudulently securing patents that had no legal validity. As a result, cancer patients and state governments were forced to pay nearly a third more for Taxol treatments. Bristol's sales of Taxol have totaled at least $5.4 billion since 1998. A standard course of treatment using the name brand drug can cost from $6,000 to $10,000 per patient. It is estimated that California spent more than $4 million at state medical facilities.

The action is the latest taken by Attorneys General against illegal marketplace manipulation, improper patent monopolization and wholesale price fixing, which result in higher drug prices for consumers.

# # #

Subscriptions

Megan's Law

California Registered Sex Offender Database

Search Now

Megan's Law information is also available in these languages:

Site Navigation

Translate Website

  • Google™ Translation Disclaimer

This Google™ translation feature is provided for informational purposes only.

The Office of the Attorney General is unable to guarantee the accuracy of this translation and is therefore not liable for any inaccurate information resulting from the translation application tool.

Please consult with a translator for accuracy if you are relying on the translation or are using this site for official business.

If you have any questions please contact:Bilingual Services Program at (916) 324-5482

A copy of this disclaimer can also be found on our Disclaimer page.

Select a Language Below / Seleccione el Idioma Abajo

Close this box or use the [ X ]