Attorney General Bonta Secures Preliminary Injunction Blocking Trump Administration from Defunding Planned Parenthood and Other Health Centers

Tuesday, December 2, 2025
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced securing a preliminary injunction from the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts blocking the Trump Administration from enforcing the “Defund Provision” within the recently enacted federal budget bill (“Big Beautiful Bill”). The Defund Provision excludes certain health centers, including Planned Parenthood health centers, from receiving federal Medicaid reimbursements. Among other things, these centers provide essential healthcare services to low-income patients, such as cancer screenings, testing and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and birth control. 

“I am grateful that the court has struck down the Defund Provision,” said Attorney General Bonta. “We should be clear-eyed about what the Defund Provision represents: A scorched-earth offensive by the Trump Administration and Congressional Republicans against Planned Parenthood and other health centers that provide essential reproductive care to those with the least among us. My fellow attorneys general and I have been, and will continue, fighting back with equal force. Allowing the Defund Provision to take effect would mean that our people will get sicker and lose access to critical healthcare services they need.”

On July 29, Attorney General Bonta co-led a coalition of 22 attorneys general and the state of Pennsylvania in filing a lawsuit over the Defund Provision. On September 24, the coalition filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. In today’s decision, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts wrote that:

  • The States are likely to succeed on the merits. The Court held that the Defund Provision fails to provide clear notice of the full scope of providers that qualify as “prohibited entities,” as required by the Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In addition, the Court held that the Defund Provision acts as an unlawful retroactive condition because it constitutes a change that the States could not have anticipated when joining Medicaid.
  • The Defund Provision would result in irreparable harm to the States if allowed to stay in effect.
  • The balance of equities and the public interest favor the States.

In a related lawsuit, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Kennedy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an unpublished order on September 11, 2025 granting the Trump Administration’s request to allow the Defund Provision to go into effect.

# # #