Consumer Protection

Five Suspects Arrested in a Violent Loan Shark Operation that Preyed on Casino Customers

June 10, 2010
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

SACRAMENTO - Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today announced the arrests of five members of a suspected loan-sharking syndicate, headed by a reputed Chinese mobster, that trapped casino gamblers in a “never-ending loop of debt and fear” by loaning them hundreds of thousands of dollars at exorbitant interest rates.

Working inside tribal casinos in the Sacramento area – including Red Hawk and Thunder Valley -- over the last 18 months, the suspects often preyed on Asian gamblers. Once the gamblers accepted loans, the amount they owed began to skyrocket. Some were charged 5 percent interest a week. Because of high interest rates and other charges, one gambler’s $100,000 loan mushroomed to $400,000 in five months.

“Loan shark enterprises like this one terrorize people through spiraling financial obligations and threats of violence,” Brown said. “Victims are trapped in a never-ending loop of debt and fear.”

Authorities said there were about 40 victims.

The charges against the five suspects include felony assault, extortion and conspiracy. Other suspects are being sought.

Among those arrested was the leader of the enterprise, Weixiong Kuang, 44, a suspected member of an organized crime syndicate called the Big Circle Boys, a violent gang out of China.

Working with a staff of armed collectors, lenders and bodyguards for more than 18 months, Kuang met his potential victims by visiting high-limit tables at casinos in the Sacramento area. He would befriend gamblers who suffered losses and offer to loan them money. If repayments were slow, Kuang would threaten the borrowers or threaten to hurt family members living in China. He is suspected of assaulting two gamblers who did not pay their debts, including one woman who was hospitalized for her injuries.

Kuang was arrested on two counts of felony assault, three counts of extortion, and felony conspiracy. Jian Liu, 43, Zhi Huang, 23, Yezhi Lei, 46, and Zi Zhen, 35, were arrested for felony conspiracy. All were booked into the El Dorado County Jail.

During searches of several residences in Sacramento, law enforcement agents found an assault rifle, large amounts of cash and some drugs.

Initiated in October 2009, the investigation was prompted by reports from citizens in the Sacramento region. The Department of Justice’s Bureau of Gambling Control worked with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Sacramento Police Department, tribal gaming authorities, as well as the Red Hawk Casino and the Thunder Valley Casino.

For more information about the Bureau of Gambling Control, please see http://ag.ca.gov/gambling/.

Three More Suspects Nabbed in Million-Dollar Bait-and-Switch Home Refinance Scam

June 9, 2010
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

LOS ANGELES — In a continuing probe into a defunct Southern California mortgage brokerage, Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today announced the arrests of president and co-owner Sean McConville and two associates who used “deceptive promises and forged documents” to steal almost $1 million from homeowners falsely guaranteed attractive home loan refinancing packages.

“These criminals employed a classic bait-and-switch in their refinance scheme,” Brown said. “With deceptive promises and forged documents, they maliciously cheated homeowners who trusted them and just wanted a fair deal.”

Brown’s office initiated its investigation in October 2008 in response to more than 70 complaints against the defendants and their mortgage brokerage business, ALG Capital, Inc. The brokerage operated out of Calabasas from early 2006 until late 2007 and then moved to Mission Hills until it shut its doors in 2008.

Brown’s investigation found that from April 2007 to October 2008, the owners and their associates lured dozens of borrowers into refinancing home loans by falsely promising low interest rates, minimal broker fees and other attractive terms. The brokerage then negotiated different terms with lenders.

When homeowners were presented with closing documents, they bore the terms promised, but which the lenders never approved. After homeowners signed the closing documents, key pages were removed and replaced with pages bearing the terms that the lender had actually agreed to. The homeowners’ signatures were then forged on the replacement pages, and ALG forwarded the forged documents to the escrow company.

Homeowners only discovered they had been defrauded when they received the final loan documents with the true terms and their signatures forged on closing cost disclosures, Truth-in-Lending disclosures, loan applications and other documents.

Additionally, ALG collected almost $1 million in undisclosed fees, charging homeowners up to $57,000 in broker fees. In total, dozens of homeowners were locked into almost $30 million in loans with terms they did not agree to.

As a result of this scheme, many homeowners were forced to sell their homes, come out of retirement, or tap retirement savings. Others paid significant prepayment penalties, including over $21,000 in one case. Borrowers also rarely received the large cash-outs they were promised as part of the refinance.

Sean McConville, 30, of Austin, Texas, president and co-owner of the brokerage, was arrested early yesterday morning at his residence. He is being held at the Travis County Jail in Texas pending extradition. He was previously convicted of robbery in November 1997.

Matthew Bourgo, 27, of Thousand Oaks, who posed as a licensed notary for the brokerage, was arrested yesterday afternoon at his residence. He is being held in Ventura County Jail and will be transferred to Los Angeles County.

Joseph Nguyen, 37, of Woodland Hills, a former loan officer for the brokerage, was also arrested yesterday afternoon at his business, where he worked as a chiropractor. He is being held by authorities in Los Angeles County.

The suspects are each being held on $29.5 million bail.

In September 2009, Brown’s office arrested three others involved in the bait-and-switch scam, including Michael McConville, 32, of Simi Valley, Sean’s brother and co-owner of the brokerage, Alan Ruiz, 29, of Huntington Beach, a former loan officer and Garrett Holdridge, 24, of Palmdale, who was convicted of seven felonies in March for his involvement in the scam.

Investigators located victims in dozens of California cities, including: Auburn, Altadena, Arroyo Grande, Azusa, Bakersfield, Berkeley, Burbank, Calabasas, Castro Valley, Chino, Compton, Corona, Fairfield, Fontana, Fremont, Fresno, Garden Grove, Glendale, Hemet, Highland, Huntington Beach, La Habra, La Mesa, La Mirada, La Quinta, Lancaster, Livermore , Los Angeles, Long Beach, Manteca, Martinez, Monterey, Murrieta, Nice, Northridge, Oakland, Ontario, Palmdale, Pasadena, Perris, Petaluma, Pomona, Quartz Hill, Rancho Cucamonga, Redlands, Reedley, Rialto, Sacramento, San Clemente, San Diego, San Jose, Santa Rosa, Sierra Madre, Spring Valley, Stanton, Temecula, Whittier, and Winnetka.

The complaint, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, includes the following charges: 38 counts of grand theft, 19 counts of forgery, three counts of elder abuse, and one count of conspiracy to commit grand theft.

Brown also filed suit against the McConville brothers in May 2009 for running a property tax reassessment scam which targeted Californians looking to lower their property taxes. The brothers billed tens of thousands of homeowners throughout California nearly $200 each for property tax reassessment services that were almost never performed and are available free of charge from local tax assessors.

Brown Prods Congress on Financial Services Reform

June 8, 2010
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

OAKLAND — Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today sent a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, calling on Congress to pass tough financial services reform legislation that contains strong consumer protection and allows state attorneys general to “enforce all federal consumer protection laws against national banks, not just regulations that may be adopted by the new Consumer Financial Protection Agency.”

Brown’s letter:

Dear Speaker Pelosi:

In anticipation of a compromise on the House and Senate financial services reform bills, I urge you to press for the strongest possible language to protect consumers and our economy from another debilitating crisis caused by reckless Wall Street banking practices and complicit federal regulators.

Two elements of a compromise bill are key to that protection. One, national banks should be subject to the same state consumer protection laws as state banking institutions and virtually all companies operating in industries other than financial services. And, two, state attorneys general should have the authority to enforce all applicable consumer protection laws against national banks.

The House language is preferable on both points, and I recommend that you push for its adoption. It would establish a higher burden for the OCC to preempt state consumer protection laws. It also would allow state attorneys general to enforce all federal consumer protection laws against national banks, not just regulations that may be adopted by the new Consumer Financial Protection Agency.

Sincerely,

EDMUND G. BROWN JR.

Brown Demands Feds Preserve an Innovative And Successful California Clean Energy Program

May 18, 2010
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

OAKLAND — Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today demanded that federal authorities keep their hands off a popular California program that allows property owners to install solar panels and other energy efficiency improvements and repay the cost later on their property taxes.

The voluntary program known as PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy) has the ability to assist thousands of California homeowners and businesses from Berkeley to Palm Desert in securing billions of dollars to make their structures greener, reduce energy waste and shrink their utility bills.

“This is an enormously popular and powerful program that helps to drive the state’s green economy and creates thousands of jobs,” Brown said.

Half the counties in the state either have such a program or are in the process of starting one. Sonoma County alone has already financed more than 800 solar and other projects worth more than $30 million.

PACE is designed to encourage property owners to make energy efficiency improvements to their buildings, such as installing solar panels or better insulation, through a 20-year tax assessment that is paid back through their property taxes. If the property is sold before the bill is fully paid, the new owner takes over the remaining payments as part of the property’s annual tax bill.

Federal officials have sent mixed signals about federal support for the program, which was launched in California. In a letter today, Brown insists that the Federal Housing Finance Agency must pledge it will not interfere with California’s successful operation of PACE.

“California’s program creates reliable markets for new green technologies,” Brown said. “It has put Californians back to work installing and maintaining energy efficient equipment up and down the state.”

Brown’s letter follows:

Edward DeMarco
Acting Director
Federal Housing Finance Agency
1700 G Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20552-0003

Dear Acting Director DeMarco:

Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs authorize local governments to finance energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements to the benefit of homeowners and small businesses. In California, PACE financing is not accomplished through loans in the traditional sense, but rather through local governments’ long-standing and well-recognized powers to assess and tax. PACE programs in California can assist thousands of individual participants statewide, help to drive the State’s green economy, and create thousands of jobs.

On May 5, 2010, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac issued short, somewhat cryptic lender and industry advice letters concerning PACE programs. While the advice letters do not expressly mention California PACE programs, they have nonetheless caused confusion and concern among California PACE stakeholders. By this letter, we request that the Federal Housing Finance Authority (FHFA) immediately confirm in writing that the advice letters do not affect PACE in California.

As you are likely aware, the California Attorney General’s Office at the end of last year began a discussion with FHFA staff about PACE in California. During these discussions, your staff assured this Office that we would continue to work together on issues related to PACE. Relying in part on this assurance, California has invested substantial resources in PACE programs, consistent with the White House’s “Recovery Through Retrofit” policy document and with the express support of the Department of Energy. A substantial portion of the approximately $300 million in Energy Efficiency and Block Grant funding, and a substantial portion of the over $220 million in additional American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds administered by the California Energy Commission through its State Energy Program, have been dedicated to PACE programs. Moreover, California recently passed legislation creating a $50 million state reserve fund that will allow participating local governments to obtain financing for PACE on more favorable terms.

The disruption caused by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s recent actions may have serious financial implications for participating local governments and the thousands of homeowners and small businesses currently participating in these programs in California. To take just one example, Sonoma County, through its PACE program, already has financed over 800 energy improvement projects. But the repercussions will be wider still. PACE programs in California create reliable markets for new technologies in energy efficiency, renewable energy, and water efficiency. They thus support green manufacturing jobs and thousands of additional jobs associated with installation and maintenance of energy efficiency and renewable energy projects. Now is not the time to create unnecessary uncertainty in these important emerging businesses and industries.

Based on our recent conversation with your General Counsel, Alfred Pollard, we understand that the May 5, 2010, letters were not intended in any way to signal a change in the position of FHFA, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac regarding PACE in California. Accordingly, we request that FHFA immediately confirm in writing that participants in California PACE programs are not in violation of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Uniform Security Instruments prohibiting loans that have a senior lien status to a mortgage. We are open to discussing with you what form that confirmation should take, including, but not limited to, withdrawal of the May 5, 2010, letters.

We would prefer not to have to pursue some form of declaratory relief to resolve the confusion, but, because of the importance of the issue to California, we certainly reserve that as an option if a clear and unequivocal response is not forthcoming.

Once this immediately pressing matter is resolved, we look forward to discussing with you what longer-term solutions may be warranted to foster the continued responsible development of PACE programs in California.

Sincerely,

EDMUND G. BROWN JR.
Attorney General

Brown Announces Huge Rebate to California Consumers Who Were Victims of the 2000-2001 Energy Crisis

April 28, 2010
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

SAN DIEGO — Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today announced settlements that will bring $400 million in refunds for California consumers who were victimized by market manipulation and exorbitant prices during the energy crisis of 2000-2001.

The two-part agreement with San Diego-based Sempra Energy will provide reimbursement of $270 million to California utility customers who each month pay off debt from the utility crisis on their gas and electric bills. Sempra will also pay $130 million to consumers to settle separate claims by the state Public Utilities Commission and the Department of Water Resources.

“The settlements,” Brown said, “will put hundreds of millions of dollars back into the pockets of California energy consumers who suffered blackouts and great economic harm during the energy crisis.”

Including the prior settlement of a class-action suit, Sempra has now paid more than $700 million for the benefit of state utility customers.

During the energy crisis, Enron, Sempra and other energy companies created phony energy shortages, blackouts and record high energy prices. As a result, California’s two largest utilities, PG&E and Southern California Edison, became insolvent, forcing the state to spend billions of dollars for huge amounts of emergency power to keep the lights on.

In legal documents, Sempra was accused of “Enron-style gaming” of the energy markets and “a pervasive pattern of market manipulation and abuse.” It was accused of entering “Enron-style partnerships” that had a destructive impact on the market, driving prices higher and reducing energy availability and reliability. It was accused of a variety of other exotic schemes called “False Import, Paper Trading and Circular Scheduling” to short-circuit the proper functioning of energy markets.

Customers of PG&E, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas and Electric (a subsidiary of Sempra) continue to pay for the energy crisis in a line item on their utility bills labeled “DWR bond charge.” Funds received in the settlements will go toward reducing those costs to ratepayers.

For the past nine years, the Attorney General has investigated, litigated and negotiated with Sempra and other energy sellers whose misconduct caused the energy crisis.

The Sempra settlement is the latest of 39 settlements hammered out by the Attorney General, in co-operation with the Public Utilities Commission, Department of Water Resources, PG&E, and Southern California Edison, that will provide more than $3 billion in ratepayer relief. The Attorney General continues to press California’s claims for compensation to ratepayers for overpriced energy sold to the state.

Brown Urges U.S. Senate to Preserve Provisions of Financial Reform Package that Allow State-Led Consumer Protection

April 22, 2010
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

LOS ANGELES - As a financial reform package advances in the Senate and an unrelenting swarm of Wall Street lobbyists descends on Capitol Hill to block it, Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today urged senators to preserve a critical portion of the legislation which allows states to join the fight against financial fraud on the front line.

Provisions of the Senate’s current bill restore the authority of attorneys general to prosecute financial crimes at the state level, a move that would safeguard consumers, bolster federal oversight, and halt reckless, quick-money schemes before they spiral into national crises.

“Today, more than two years after the recession began, as thousands more Americans lose their homes, jobs and savings, states remain hamstrung in the fight against financial fraud. Even if a state witnesses a crime on its own front porch, it has limited, if any, authority to act,” Brown said. “If Congress is committed to preventing another downturn and enacting robust reform, it must preserve the provisions in the current package that untie states’ hands and allow us to join the fight.”

To press for these provisions, Brown sent letters today to Senators Reid, McConnell, Dodd, Shelby, Feinstein and Boxer urging them to uphold the role of the states in enforcing consumer protection laws. This follows a letter Brown and 39 other state attorneys general sent in November to members of Congress on the same issue.

While big banks on Wall Street announced billions in quarterly profits this week, another 200,000 California homeowners received a foreclosure notice between January and March. During the first three months of 2010, California alone accounted for almost a quarter of the nation’s foreclosure activity. Meanwhile, since the recession began, the state’s unemployment rate has more than doubled, rising to 12.6 percent in March.

Brown’s letter is copied below:

Dear Senator:

As California continues to struggle through the current financial crisis, with one of the highest foreclosure rates in the nation and a 12.6% unemployment rate, I urge you to adopt financial reform legislation that protects consumers against the predatory banking practices that led to this collapse. Ensuring that state Attorneys General have the authority to protect consumers against reckless Wall Street practices is critical to that protection. The current version of the Restoring American Financial Stability Act (SB 3217) gives back to states the authority to take action against national banks. I call on you to ensure that that state authority remains in the final bill, and that you resist the pressure exerted by Wall Street and its lobbyists to maintain the status quo of no government oversight.

Predatory lending and the avalanche of foreclosures it triggered lie at the core of our current crisis. Missing-in-action federal agency enforcement, and, indeed, active federal agency protection of national banks engaged in predatory lending, enabled this crisis. The federal laws and regulations that barred my office from stepping into the void to prosecute those banks and their subsidiaries for their deception contributed significantly. In the end, our current regulatory system gave national banks a free pass, while consumers and our economy paid the price.

The pending Senate bill gives Congress the opportunity to reverse course and provide a much-needed level playing field between Main Street consumers and Wall Street. The bill does away with regulations that shielded predatory practices and allows states to enforce their own consumer protection laws, and laws adopted by the new federal Consumer Financial Protection Agency, against Wall Street banks.

Wall Street's warning against a resulting unmanageable patchwork of state laws is a red herring. States routinely seek to harmonize their laws with related state and federal laws, and they often work together to bring multistate enforcement actions. Moreover, national banks have demonstrated their ability to market differently to different states when it suits them, as in the case of Pay Option Arm loans targeted to markets like California that, at the time, experienced steeply escalating property values.

And while the bill’s new Consumer Financial Protection Agency moves federal oversight in the right direction, it isn’t enough. One agency in Washington, regardless of how well-intended, can’t have its ears to the ground in all 50 states to prosecute misconduct the way each Attorney General can in his or her home state. State Attorneys General are the cops-on-the-beat who consumers turn to to sound the alarm on new threats targeting them. Prompt state action can limit the spread of those threats before they become national crises.

Congress need look no further than the failure of Washington Mutual to see why state Attorney General enforcement is an essential component of the reform needed to stop opportunistic, predatory actors from taking advantage of lax rules and absent enforcement. The Senate panel investigating the current crisis concluded that WAMU’s deceptive lending practices and employee incentive plans that promoted them created a “mortgage time bomb” with toxic loans destined to fail. When that time bomb exploded, and WAMU loans started plunging into foreclosure, federal laws and regulations prevented state Attorneys General from suing WAMU to halt its predatory practices. Instead, that responsibility was reserved for federal regulators who did nothing, notwithstanding the findings of at least one of those regulators that WAMU had engaged in a pattern of fraud and weak risk management.

By contrast, my office and other state Attorneys General have worked together to hold state-licensed banks accountable for their fraudulent practices. After suing Countrywide Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries for predatory lending practices in the Summer of 2008, our settlement with Countrywide forced it to modify loans of homeowners facing foreclosure and to pay restitution to consumers who had lost their homes.

Unfortunately, I couldn’t take action against WAMU for the harm it caused Californians in the way I could against Countrywide. And if the existing regulatory structure remains in place, banks will continue to flock to national charters to avoid state action like ours against Countrywide. But, if the Senate steps up and does the right thing now to protect consumers, and the nation’s economy, by adopting financial reform that protects the authority of states to enforce consumer protection rights, then we will have real change, and unscrupulous banks won’t be able to hide behind federal regulators who were complicit in their misdeeds.

Brown Accuses Moody's of Refusing To Explain Its Role in Financial Crisis

April 19, 2010
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

LOS ANGELES – Accusing giant bond-rating firm Moody’s Investors Service of withholding evidence documenting its role in the housing and Wall Street meltdown, Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today announced court action to force Moody’s to explain why it gave its highest ratings to “risky and toxic” mortgage-backed securities that ultimately cost investors and taxpayers billions of dollars.

Brown’s action comes seven months after the Attorney General subpoenaed Moody’s, but the firm has refused to comply with the subpoena.

“The need for court action to enforce a state subpoena is highly unusual,” Brown said, “because companies almost always comply without such a drastic step being necessary.” But he said Moody’s, which played a central role in the run-up to the collapse of housing prices, has refused to explain its ratings practices to the state. Moody’s said responding to the state subpoena would be a “waste of time.”

“The state’s subpoena seeks information regarding Moody’s decision to give its highest credit ratings to securities backed by risky and toxic mortgage-backed securities,” Brown said.

“By taking this step, I intend to stop Moody’s from ignoring the state’s subpoena,” Brown said. “The people of California have the right to know how this credit rating agency got it so wrong and whether it violated California law in the process.”

Moody’s and other credit rating agencies ignored red flags in the run-up to the collapse in housing prices and gave stellar ratings to shaky securities, which made those investments appear as safe as government-issued Treasury bonds, Brown explained.

“But investors swiftly learned that the ratings were as worthless as the securities themselves,” he said.

Brown said Moody’s and other ratings agencies worked behind the scenes with the same Wall Street firms that created the securities, earning billions of dollars in revenue from those firms at a rate nearly double what they earned for rating other securities.

“A central question in the aftermath of the financial meltdown is whether Moody’s gave investment banks and other securities packagers unwarranted high ratings at the expense of investors, who depended upon the integrity and independence of Moody’s ratings,” Brown said.

The subpoena issued by Brown’s office on Sept. 17, 2009, seeks to determine:

• Whether Moody’s knew that the AAA ratings it gave to high-risk securities weren’t warranted
• Whether Moody’s made fraudulent representations about the quality of its ratings
• Whether Moody’s made fraudulent representations concerning the independence of its ratings
• Whether Moody’s conspired with companies it rated to the detriment of investors
• Whether Moody’s profited from giving inaccurate ratings to some securities
• Whether Moody’s compromised its own standards and safeguards in order to increase its own profits.

Moody’s and other Wall Street ratings agencies grade the credit worthiness of the bonds and securities that corporations and municipalities issue. Investors depend on these ratings to gauge risk in making investments. At the peak of the housing boom, these agencies gave their highest ratings to complicated, high-risk financial instruments that soon accelerated the financial collapse.

Brown said banks, pension funds and other investors, in California and elsewhere, relied on these ratings when they purchased trillions of dollars of securities backed by risky mortgages, seeking high returns and reassured by ratings indicating the issues were low-risk. Those purchases helped inflate the housing bubble by enabling ever-riskier mortgages.

When the speculative bubble burst, those risky mortgages defaulted in record numbers and investors were left unable to sell now-worthless securities. The agencies then downgraded the credit ratings of more than $1.9 trillion in residential mortgage-backed securities, a tacit acknowledgement they had ignored or did not understand the risks of the debt they rated, Brown said.

Moody’s is one of the most profitable companies in the country. It had the highest profit margin of any company in the S&P 500 in the years leading up to 2008 – higher than Google or Microsoft, according to U.S. Representative Henry Waxman, Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Brown’s investigation of Moody’s is one of many actions by his office to fight financial abuses relating to the mortgage meltdown, including his 2008 lawsuit that resulted in an $8.68 billion settlement with Countrywide Home Loans over its fraudulent lending practices, as well as recent crackdowns by the Attorney General on foreclosure consultants and loan-modification scammers.

Three Arrested in Sophisticated Medi-Cal Fraud And 'Doctor Shopping' Ring

April 15, 2010
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

SAN DIEGO—Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today announced the arrests of a doctor and two employees operating a “complex, multi-level scheme” that bilked more than $200,000 from low-income patients and government agencies by overcharging and prescribed pain medication to individuals who had no medical need for it.

Beginning in 2007, the three individuals arrested Wednesday perpetrated their scheme to defraud state and federal health insurance programs and patients in the San Diego area.

“These individuals operated a complex, multi-level fraud scheme,” Brown said. “Today’s arrests are a result of the cooperative efforts of state and federal law enforcement to take this dirty doctor off the streets.”

The individuals arrested today include Dr. Mohammed Tarek Kady, 55, Mario Ramirez Zarco, 31, and Ana Audelo, 23, all three from Chula Vista.

All three individuals were charged with violating California Penal Code sections 182(a)(1), 182(a)(4), 487(a), and 550(b)(3) for conspiring to cheat and defraud, to commit grand theft, and commit insurance fraud.

In addition, Kady was also charged with:
• One count of violating California Welfare and Institutions Code section 14107(b)(4)(A) for Medi-Cal fraud
• Five counts of violating California Penal Code section 487(a) for grand theft
• Three counts of violating California Penal Code section 550(a)(6) for insurance fraud
• Seven counts of violating California Health and Safety Code section 11153(a) for illegal prescribing
• One count of violating California Labor Code 3700.5(a) for failing to obtain worker’s compensation for employees
• Special Allegations of theft, including theft in excess of $100,000.

The arrests are the result of a cooperative effort between Brown’s office, the San Diego District Attorney’s Insurance Fraud Task Force, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), San Diego Health Care Fraud Squad and San Diego Organized Crime Squad, the California Department of Industrial Relations, and the federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Tactical Diversion Squad.

In February 2009, an Anthem Blue Cross investigator reported Kady’s pediatric office in Chula Vista was unlawfully charging fees to patients enrolled in state and federal health insurance plans.

Two of Kady’s employees, Mario Zarco and Ana Audelo, unlawfully charged patients $50 to $500 for assistance in enrollment in state and federal health insurance coverage. Kady himself unlawfully charged patients an additional $200 to $300 fee to examine their newborn children in the hospital.

Investigators estimate that Kady unlawfully charged more than $60,000 for services to individuals and families enrolled in state and federal health insurance coverage.

Brown’s investigation also showed Kady frequently traveled out of the country for several weeks at a time but continued to charge for his services at his Chula Vista office. Reimbursement claims indicate Kady charged more than $160,000 for services when, in reality, he was out of the country.

In addition to overcharging for services and charging for services never performed, Kady prescribed pain medication to individuals without any justifiable medical purpose, enabling patients apparently “doctor shopping” for drugs. Kady wrote prescriptions for opiates, including the narcotic, Vicodin, and codeine cough syrups to drug addicts abusing the drugs and illegally selling them. On seven DEA sting operations, most recently last month, Kady prescribed narcotics without medical justification.

Kady’s patients were instructed to fill their pain medication prescription at one San Diego pharmacy. An employee at the pharmacy became suspicious after dozens of individuals attempted to fill prescriptions, written by Kady, at the pharmacy each Friday. The investigation revealed Kady and the pharmacy owner had a quid pro quo arrangement in which the pharmacy would kick back some $3 per prescription.

According to the Medical Board of California, Mohammed Tarek Kady was licensed as a physician in December 1997. He is a family practitioner with board certification in Pediatrics, and maintained two clinics, one in Chula Vista and one in San Diego.

If convicted of all charges, Kady faces as much as 20 years in prison. Zarco and Audelo face up to 6 years in prison if convicted of all charges.

“The Drug Enforcement Administration is committed to keeping the San Diego community safe from doctors who enable the abuse of prescription drugs”, says Special Agent in Charge Ralph W. Partridge. “The suspension of Doctor Kady’s controlled substance privilege is an important step toward ensuring accountability of those who supply controlled substances illegally”.

A copy of the complaint filed in San Diego Superior Court is attached. Photos of the defendants are also attached.

AttachmentSize
PDF icon Kady Complaint.pdf540.82 KB
Image icon n1899_ana_audelo.jpg105.86 KB
Image icon n1899_m_tarek_kady.jpg99.84 KB
Image icon n1899_mario_zarco.jpg104.66 KB

Brown Seeks $500,000 for Southern California Drywall Workers Denied Fair Pay

April 14, 2010
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

LOS ANGELES—-Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today filed a lawsuit against MDP California, Inc. for “dodging fair wage and labor laws” by denying workers overtime pay, worker’s compensation and pay for all hours worked. He is seeking $500,000 in restitution for cheated workers.

MDP California, a Nevada Corporation doing drywall installation throughout Southern California, also failed to pay state-mandated unemployment insurance, state disability fund payments, and state and federal taxes.

“MDP California cheated its workers and the State out of hundreds of thousands of dollars by dodging fair wage and labor laws,” Brown said. “Those kinds of business practices will not be tolerated in California.”

In late 2009, Brown launched an investigation into MDP California after being notified of possible worker’s rights violations. The subsequent investigation found hundreds of violations of California law.

Brown’s office also alleged that because the firm did not pay its workers a fair wage or pay state taxes, MDP California had an unfair advantage over its competitors and could underbid them for jobs.

Today’s lawsuit contends MDP California violated:
• California Labor Code section 510 by denying overtime pay
• California Labor Code section 226 by providing wages to employees in other employees’ names
• California Wage Order 16-2001(4)(A) denying pay for all hours worked
• California Labor Code section 226.7 by denying employees with a 10-minute break each four hours
• California Labor Code section 3700 by failing to pay worker’s compensation insurance
• California Labor Code section 201 by failing to pay wages owed to laid-off employees immediately
• California Business and Professions Code section 17200 for engaging in unfair business practices.

According to workers interviewed by Brown’s office, MDP California required workers to regularly work nine to 11 hours per day, Monday through Saturday and on sometimes on Sunday. None of the workers received any additional compensation for overtime worked.

One worker who was injured on the job was forced to take time off unpaid because he was not provided with any worker’s compensation.

Last week, Brown announced his office had won restitution for over 200 employees of Charles Evleth Construction, Inc., a Bakersfield construction company. The agreement also prohibited the company from denying workers fair wages and overtime pay, paying employees in cash to avoid state and federal taxes, and permitting supervisors to take kickbacks from employees in exchange for the employees being allowed to work.

Last month, Brown announced two other lawsuits against companies that denied their workers minimum wage, overtime pay, and in some cases, subjected workers to potentially deadly working environments.

On March 10, Brown sued Juan Munoz, a farm labor contractor in Southern California, for neglecting to provide rest breaks, potable drinking water or shade to field workers.

On March 3, Brown sued Livermore-based Country Builders after the company falsified payroll records to hide underpayments, deliberately misclassified workers to reduce the company's workers' compensation premiums and violated state prevailing wage laws.

The Attorney General’s investigation was conducted by his Underground Economy Unit. To protect mistreated workers, Brown created the unit in 2007 to investigate businesses for suspected violations of state wage and labor laws.

A copy of the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court is attached.

AttachmentSize
PDF icon n1898_mdp_complaint.pdf192.48 KB

Brown Prosecution Sends Phony Foreclosure Consultants To Jail And Recovers Stolen Funds

April 9, 2010
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

SANTA ANA — In a clear “warning shot” to unscrupulous loan-modification consultants, Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today announced that two women have each been sentenced to one year in jail and ordered to repay dozens of homeowners who were charged thousands of dollars in up-front fees for non-existent foreclosure-relief services.

Marianne Curtis, 69, of Costa Mesa and Mary Alice Yraceburu, 46, of Riverdale, who operated Fresno and Orange County-based Foreclosure Freedom, pleaded guilty last month to 71 criminal counts, including grand theft, conspiracy and unlawful foreclosure consulting. Both will serve one year in Orange County jail and an additional four years of probation.

“Curtis and Yraceburu shamelessly exploited homeowners desperate to avoid foreclosure, charging up to $1,800 in up-front fees for loan modifications that were never delivered,” Brown said. “Today’s jail sentences send a warning shot to loan-modification consultants: If you swindle homeowners, you face serious time behind bars.”

Brown’s office initiated its investigation into Curtis and Yraceburu in early 2008 after receiving a complaint from the Tulare County District Attorney. Charges were filed in Orange County Superior Court on March 19, 2009, against the defendants, and both pleaded guilty on March 24, 2010.

Brown’s investigation located victims in many California towns and cities: Antelope, Avenal, Bakersfield, Crows Landing, Elk Grove, Fairfield, Fresno, Galt, Hanford, Hayward, Hollister, Kingsburg, Mendota, Modesto, Petaluma, Placerville, Richmond, Ridgecrest, Rio Linda, Sacramento, Salinas, San Leandro, Simi Valley, Stockton, Taft, Vacaville, Vallejo and Ventura.

In addition to today’s jail sentences, Curtis and Yraceburu were ordered to repay 36 victims a total of $32,040. If eligible victims not named in the complaint come forward, the court can order additional repayment throughout the defendants’ probation term. As a condition of today’s sentence, both defendants are also prohibited from any future work in the telemarketing and real estate industries.

Brown’s investigation found that from April 2007 until February 2008, the two women paid for access to foreclosure listings so they could directly solicit hundreds of homeowners underwater on their mortgages with mailers promising relief.

When homeowners called the number on the mailer, they were told their mortgages could be renegotiated to a lower monthly payment. Victims, however, were required to pay up to $1,800 in up-front fees and were instructed not to contact their lenders.

Victims were assured the company had “private lenders and specialists exclusive to their company who are very experienced in the options and methods used to renegotiate home loans,” yet neither of the women who operated the company had real estate licenses, legal training or any experience in the home mortgage market.

Investigators found no evidence they had negotiated any successful loan modifications, and most of the victims were either forced into bankruptcy or lost their homes to foreclosure. Bank account records revealed the defendants took over $120,000 from unsuspecting homeowners.

Both Curtis and Yraceburu pleaded guilty to all 71 criminal counts including:
• 34 counts of unlawful foreclosure consulting
• 29 counts of grand theft
• 7 counts of attempted grand theft
• 1 count of conspiracy

By law, all individuals and businesses offering mortgage-foreclosure consulting or loan-modification and foreclosure-assistance services must register with Brown’s office and post a $100,000 bond. It is also illegal for loan-modification consultants to charge up-front fees for their services.

Non-profit housing counselors certified by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development provide free help to homeowners. To find a counselor in your area, call 1-800-569-4287.

If you are a homeowner who has been scammed, contact Brown’s office at 1-800-952-5225 or file a complaint online at: www.ag.ca.gov/consumers/general.php.

Brown has sought court orders to shut down more than 30 fraudulent foreclosure-relief companies and has brought criminal charges and obtained lengthy prison sentences for dozens of other deceptive loan-modification consultants. Last month, Brown secured a court judgment that shut down two Orange County-based foreclosure-assistance companies, secured $1 million in restitution for victims and prohibited three individuals from ever working in the real estate industry again.

For more information on Brown’s action against loan-modification fraud visit: http://ag.ca.gov/loanmod.

A copy of the amended complaint, filed in Orange County Superior Court, is attached.

AttachmentSize
PDF icon n1896_foreclosure_freedom_complaint.pdf974.96 KB