Lawsuits & Settlements

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Announces Settlement to Protect Public Health in Jurupa Valley

February 14, 2013
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

LOS ANGELES -- Attorney General Kamala D. Harris today announced a settlement in a lawsuit challenging the approval of an industrial project in Riverside County that would cause additional diesel truck traffic near a community already disproportionately affected by diesel exhaust and noise pollution.

As part of today's agreement, the City of Jurupa Valley and other parties will take action to significantly reduce the project's air quality impacts on Mira Loma Village, a primarily Hispanic residential community. 

"It is a false choice to suggest that in order for California business to thrive, public health must suffer," Attorney General Harris said. "It is my intention that this settlement will provide a model for local governments, developers and communities to work together to ensure responsible development benefiting all Californians."

In September 2011, Attorney General Harris joined the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) action filed by the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice to set aside Riverside County's approval for the Mira Loma Commerce Center, which would consist of a million square feet of warehouses and industrial buildings.

The suit outlined the county's failure to adequately analyze and mitigate the project's impacts on Mira Loma Village residents in light of the already serious health and environmental risks suffered by the community.

The City of Jurupa Valley, which was incorporated in 2011, now has jurisdiction over the project site. The city and the project developers agreed as part of today's settlement to implement and fund the following:

-          Proceedings for preparation of an Environmental Justice Element of the City's General Plan;

-          Installation of air filtration systems in the homes of Mira Loma residents;

-          Air quality monitoring in Mira Loma Village;

-          Landscaping in setback areas with plants with potential to remove or reduce exposure to diesel particulate emissions; and,

-          A "green" project site, including a 100kW capacity solar photovoltaic system, LEED Silver certified project buildings, and electric vehicle charging stations.

"We are extremely impressed with the cooperative process that took place to arrive at this agreement," said Penny Newman, Executive Director of the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice. "This settlement has created the 'gold standard' for settlements in addressing impacts through a model process of how diverse stakeholders can come together and cooperatively find comprehensive solutions."

The settlement also requires the City of Jurupa Valley to conduct proceedings to adopt an ordinance to prohibit heavy trucks on the road adjacent to Mira Loma Village, to implement an anti-idling enforcement program and to consider environmental justice during CEQA review for future projects in the City.

Since the 1990s, Riverside County has approved a series of warehouse projects that are now under the City of Jurupa Valley's jurisdiction. Thousands of trucks travel to and from the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach to distribution centers and warehouses in the City of Jurupa Valley and other areas of Riverside County each day. These trucks spew diesel exhaust causing harmful health impact to residents living near the freeways and roads on which the trucks travel. Diesel exhaust is listed as a known carcinogen under Proposition 65. The levels of particulate matter and ozone pollutants in the Jurupa Valley area are significantly higher than both California and federal air quality standards.  

This settlement will help reduce the public health impacts caused by the project and existing warehouse facilities on the overburdened community of Mira Loma Village. This settlement serves as a model for how other local governments can encourage smart development while also addressing environmental public health in their communities.

A copy of the consent judgment is attached to the press release.

AttachmentSize
PDF icon Consent Judgment14.52 MB

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Sues Standard & Poor’s for Inflated Ratings that Caused Investors to Lose Billions

February 5, 2013
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

SAN FRANCISCO -- Attorney General Kamala D. Harris today filed a lawsuit against one of the nation's major credit rating companies for inflating its ratings of structured finance investments, which caused California's public pension funds and other investors to lose billions of dollars.

The complaint, filed today in San Francisco Superior Court, alleges that the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Standard and Poor's Financial Services LLC violated the False Claims Act and other state laws by using a ratings process based on what senior executives described as "magic numbers" and "guesses."

"For years, S&P placed its priority on maintaining its market share, instead of the investors who trusted in its supposedly objective ratings," said Attorney General Harris. "When the housing bubble burst, S&P's house of cards collapsed and California paid the price—in billions. S&P must be held accountable for its conduct that contributed to one of our country's worst financial crises."

Investors relied on S&P and its competitors to rate these securities because they had access to only general descriptions of the assets backing their investments, which often included mortgages. California's public pension funds also relied on S&P because they are often required to buy securities that received a coveted "AAA" rating, signaling that the investment was top-tier and bore minimal risk.

The complaint alleges that, from 2004 to 2007, S&P systematically misrepresented to the public, and to CalPERS and CalSTRS, that its ratings of structured finance securities were based on an independent, objective and reliable analysis, and not influenced by S&P's economic interests.

In doing so, S&P lowered its standards for rating securities to gain market share and increase profits, and violated the False Claims Act by making false statements about the nature and risk of investments. The complaint also describes the company's efforts to suppress the development of new and more accurate ratings models.

In mid-2007, the housing bubble burst. After securities that S&P had deemed the least risky began defaulting, S&P downgraded many residential mortgage backed securities investments. The market collapsed, and of those securities issued in 2007, more than 90 percent were downgraded to junk status.

The California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) and the California State Teachers Retirement System (STRS) – two of the nation's largest institutional investors – lost approximately $1 billion.

Attorney General Harris today joined the U.S. Department of Justice and 12 other states and the District of Columbia in announcing lawsuits in Washington, D.C. The other lawsuits allege violations of the federal Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act and state unfair competition laws.

However, California's suit is unique because it is being filed not only under California's unfair competition laws but also under the state's False Claims Act. This suit includes a claim for triple damages – because when the state makes a purchase based on a false statement, the defendant is responsible for the amount lost times three.

The lawsuit arises from a 20-month investigation into the issuance and rating of mortgage-backed securities by Attorney General Harris's California Mortgage Fraud Strike Force, which she formed in May 2011 to comprehensively investigate misconduct in the mortgage industry. The Attorney General's additional efforts to investigate the mortgage crisis include securing an estimated $18 billion for California in the National Mortgage Settlement and sponsoring the California Homeowner Bill of Rights, a package of laws instituting permanent mortgage-related reforms.

The complaint is attached to the online version of this press release at http://oag.ca.gov/.

AttachmentSize
PDF icon S&P Complaint4.05 MB

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Sues BP and ARCO over Environmental Violations at Gas Stations

February 4, 2013
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

OAKLAND-- Attorney General Kamala D. Harris filed a civil lawsuit on February 1 against BP West Coast Products, BP Products North America, Inc. and Atlantic Richfield Company for allegedly violating state laws governing hazardous materials and hazardous waste by failing to properly inspect and maintain underground tanks used to store gasoline for retail sale at more than 780 gas stations in California.

"Safe storage of gasoline is not only common sense, it is essential to protecting the integrity of California's groundwater resources," Attorney General Harris said. "California's hazardous waste laws safeguard public health and this lawsuit ensures proper maintenance of the tanks that store fuel beneath California’s communities."

Attorney General Harris was joined in this enforcement action by Alameda County District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley, Glenn County District Attorney Robert Maloney, Merced County District Attorney Larry D. Morse II, Nevada County District Attorney Clifford Newell, Placer County District Attorney R. Scott Owens, San Bernardino County District Attorney Michael A. Ramos, Stanislaus County District Attorney Birgit Fladager and Yuba County District Attorney Patrick McGrath.

The complaint filed February 1 in Alameda County Superior Court alleges that, since October 2006, the BP companies and ARCO have improperly monitored, inspected and maintained underground storage tanks used to store gasoline for retail sale. The complaint alleges that the defendants tampered with or disabled leak detection devices, and failed to test secondary containment systems, conduct monthly inspections, train employees in proper protocol, and maintain operational alarm systems, among other violations. The lawsuit also alleges that the defendants improperly handled and disposed of hazardous wastes and materials associated with the underground storage tanks at retail gas stations throughout the state.

The complaint follows a recent statewide investigation led by Attorney General Harris's office, which found violations of hazardous materials and hazardous waste laws and regulations at BP gas stations in 37 counties across the state.

In January 2012, the Attorney General's office filed a similar lawsuit against Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips:

http://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-kamala-d-harris-sues-phillips-66-and-conocophillips-over.

Deputy Attorney Generals Brett J. Morris and Deborah Halberstadt are prosecuting the case for Attorney General Harris's Environment Section.

A copy of the complaint, which contains the addresses of the gas stations, is attached to the online version of this release at http://oag.ca.gov.

AttachmentSize
PDF icon Complaint2.46 MB

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Files Unfair Competition Lawsuits over Use of Pirated Software in Apparel Industry

January 24, 2013
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

LOS ANGELES -- Attorney General Kamala D. Harris today filed lawsuits against two international apparel manufacturers for gaining an unfair competitive advantage over American companies by using pirated software in the production of clothing imported and sold in California.

The companies, based in China and India, did not pay licensing fees for software, including products manufactured by Adobe, Microsoft, Symantec and others. The complaints allege that the foreign apparel manufacturers who have not paid software licensing fees have a significant cost advantage in the low-margin business of apparel manufacturing, shipment and sales.

“Companies across the globe should be on notice that they will be held accountable in California for stealing our intellectual property,” Attorney General Harris said. “This is an anticompetitive practice which harms our state’s economy and is illegal. These lawsuits go after overseas companies whose unlawful actions are eroding California’s garment industry and placing California companies who legally pay for computer software at a disadvantage.”

The lawsuits, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, charge Pratibha Syntex Ltd. of India and Ningbo Beyond Home Textile Co. Ltd., and its sister companies, of China with violating California’s Unfair Competition Law. Since 2010, the Ningbo Companies shipped approximately 713,000 pounds of apparel products into California. Pratibha has shipped more than 19,000 pounds into the state.

Ningbo Beyond Group exports men’s suits, blazers, coats and jackets, as well as fleece cargo pants, fleece jackets and caps to California. Pratibha Syntex exports women’s cotton tops and other clothes for men, women, and children.

The complaints also allege that these companies obtain an unfair advantage because they can redirect money saved by using pirated software to hire employees and to expand their facilities and their research and development efforts. Furthermore, American companies that are developing software, particularly software that is used in the garment industry, are discouraged from investing in new technology and products if they know their software will be used illegally.

California’s apparel manufacturers, which are largely based in Los Angeles County, employed more than 58,000 people last year and generated more than $5 billion in annual revenues since 1990. In 2010, the industry employed 40,872 workers in Los Angeles County, which accounts for nearly 70 percent of the industry’s workforce in the state.

A study by the Orange County Business Council found that California has lost nearly 400,000 manufacturing and technology jobs over the past decade to countries where piracy rates are as high as 80 percent. This activity has resulted in a loss of $1.6 billion in economic activity and $700 million in tax revenue for California.

The complaints are attached to the online version of this release at http://oag.ca.gov/news.

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Sues Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips over Environmental Violations at Gas Stations

January 2, 2013
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

SAN FRANCISCO -- Attorney General Kamala D. Harris today filed a civil lawsuit against Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips for allegedly violating state law by failing to properly inspect and maintain underground tanks used to store gasoline for retail sale at more than 560 gas stations in California.

"The state's hazardous waste laws help protect our residents from contaminated groundwater," Attorney General Harris said. "This lawsuit safeguards public health by ensuring proper maintenance of the tanks that store fuel beneath many California communities."

The Attorney General's office was joined in this enforcement action by Alameda County District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley, El Dorado County District Attorney Vern Pierson, Merced County District Attorney Larry D. Morse II, Nevada County District Attorney Clifford Newell, Placer County District Attorney R. Scott Owens, San Bernardino County District Attorney Michael A. Ramos, and Stanislaus County District Attorney Birgit Fladager.

The complaint filed today in Alameda County Superior Court alleges that, since November 2006, Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips have improperly monitored, inspected and maintained underground storage tanks used to store gasoline for retail sale. The complaint alleges that the defendants tampered with or disabled leak detection devices, and failed to test secondary containment systems, conduct monthly inspections, train employees in proper protocol, and maintain operational alarm systems, among other violations. The lawsuit also alleges that the defendants improperly handled and disposed of hazardous wastes and materials associated with the underground storage tanks at retail gas stations throughout the state.

A statewide investigation led by the Attorney General's office found violations of hazardous materials and hazardous waste laws and regulations at gas stations in 34 counties across the state.

Deputy Attorney Generals Brett J. Morris and Deborah Halberstadt are prosecuting the case for Attorney General Harris' Environment Section.

A copy of the complaint is attached to the online version of this release at http://oag.ca.gov.

AttachmentSize
PDF icon Complaint_ConocoPhillips.pdf1.79 MB

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Files Lawsuit against eBay for Anticompetitive Hiring Agreement

November 16, 2012
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

SAN FRANCISCO -- Attorney General Kamala D. Harris today filed a lawsuit against eBay for entering into a “handshake” hiring agreement with Intuit that prohibited the company from recruiting and hiring one another's employees.

The complaint alleges that from 2006 to 2009, senior executives at eBay and Intuit agreed not to recruit employees who worked for the other company, and eBay agreed not to hire any Intuit employees. As a result, employees of both companies were prevented from seeking potentially better-paying positions. The companies passed on talented employees because of their anticompetitive agreement.

“The pact harmed employees and it harmed competition,” said Attorney General Harris. “If California is going to continue to be the high-tech capital of the world, we can’t allow anticompetitive conduct that prevents talent from going where it’s put to its highest use.”

The complaint filed by Attorney General Harris alleges that senior executives at eBay entered into a “no-poach” agreement to restrict their ability to recruit and hire employees of the other company. Intuit is being named a co-conspirator. The agreement prohibited either company from soliciting one another’s employees for employment opportunities and for over a year, prevented eBay from hiring any employees at all from Intuit.

The agreement was enforced at the highest levels of the company. The complaint alleges that emails exchanged between eBay’s chief executive officer and Intuit’s founder and chairman detail their intention not to recruit or hire one another’s employees.

Harris' complaint alleges that the agreement between the companies violated California’s Unfair Competition Law, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and the Cartwright Act.

The California Justice Department worked closely with the U.S. Department of Justice on this matter. The U.S. Department of Justice also has filed a case against eBay for their “no poach” agreement. The U.S. DOJ already has an injunction in place against Intuit relating to a similar agreement Intuit reached with other companies. Harris' separate lawsuit, however, is significant because it seeks to enforce California laws which contain stronger protections against anti-competitive conduct than federal law.

California seeks to recover damages for each act of unfair competition, as well as injunctive relief to prevent any such agreement from occurring again.  

AttachmentSize
PDF icon eBay filedcomplaint.pdf470.46 KB

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Announces Settlement with Anthem Blue Cross over Data Breach

October 1, 2012
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

SAN FRANCISCO -- Attorney General Kamala D. Harris today announced a settlement with one of California’s largest health insurers over allegations the company failed to protect the personal information of its members.

The lawsuit, which was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court today along with the settlement, alleges that Blue Cross of California, which does business under the trade name Anthem Blue Cross, printed Social Security numbers on letters mailed to more than 33,000 of its Medicare Supplement and Medicare Part D subscribers between April 2011 and March 2012. The complaint states that Anthem’s conduct violated a state law that restricts the disclosure of Social Security numbers.

"Our office is committed to protecting the privacy of Californians," said Attorney General Harris. "This settlement requires the company to make significant improvements to its data security procedures to ensure this type of error does not happen again."

After the incident, Anthem sent a letter to all affected members whose Social Security numbers were visible through the mailed envelope, notifying them of the breach and offering each a year of free credit monitoring services.

The settlement also requires Anthem to implement new technical safeguards for its data management system, restrict employee access to members’ Social Security numbers and provide enhanced data security training for all of its associates.

The company must also pay $150,000 to settle the claim. The complaint and settlement reflect Attorney General Harris’ continued efforts to protect Californians’ privacy particularly where thousands of consumers can have their personal information released with a mere push of a button.

Copies of the complaint and judgment submitted to the court for approval are attached to the online version of this release at www.oag.ca.gov.

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Reaches $2.4 Million Plea Agreement in Kern County Fraud Case

September 27, 2012
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

BAKERSFIELD -- Attorney General Kamala D. Harris today announced a plea agreement with the owner of a garbage collection company that illegally dumped Los Angeles County garbage in a Kern County landfill.

Paul Michael Benz, 68, owner and operator of Benz Sanitation, pled guilty today in Kern County Superior Court to one felony charge of presenting a fraudulent claim for payment to the government. As part of today’s plea agreement, Benz will pay nearly $2.4 million in restitution, and take other actions to prevent illegal conduct in the future.

Between January 2008 and September 2012, Benz Sanitation had a waste removal services contract with Kern County that allowed it to take Kern County’s residential garbage and deposit it at local landfills at no charge. During this time, Benz Sanitation also contracted with almost 1,500 residents and businesses in Los Angeles County to remove their residential and commercial garbage. Benz then manipulated these contracts by fraudulently mislabeling the Los Angeles County garbage as originating in Kern County so that he could dump it free of charge in Kern County’s landfills.

Benz Sanitation’s dumping practices were first questioned when deposits in the local Kern County landfill dropped dramatically after the City of Ridgecrest ended its contract with Benz and hired a new garbage collection company. Further investigation revealed that Benz Sanitation was hauling garbage from Los Angeles County to the Material Recovery Facility in Kern County and falsely reporting that the garbage had originated in Kern County, defrauding the county of approximately $2 million.

As a result of today’s plea agreement, Benz is required to leave the company and pay $2,375,000 in restitution. He will also be placed on felony probation. To prevent future illegal conduct, Benz Sanitation will place GPS trackers on all vehicles to provide location data to Kern County. County officials will randomly audit the company’s records, will review weight tickets in the company’s scale house, and barcode all vehicles by route.

The California Attorney General’s Office was initially asked to look into CalRecycle’s concerns about violations of statewide disposal reporting in Kern County. The office then coordinated with local law enforcement agencies during the investigation of Benz and his company.

A copy of the agreement is attached to the electronic version of this release at http://oag.ca.gov/news.

AttachmentSize
PDF icon benz.pdf177.44 KB

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Announces National Administrator to Begin Foreclosure Refund Process

September 25, 2012
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

SACRAMENTO -- Attorney General Kamala D. Harris today announced that claim forms will be sent to approximately 432,584 California borrowers who lost their homes to foreclosure between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2011 and may be eligible for a settlement payment under the $25 billion national mortgage foreclosure settlement.

Borrowers receiving the claim forms had mortgages serviced by Ally/GMAC, Bank of America, Citi, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo, the servicers that agreed to the settlement with the federal government and attorneys general of 49 states and the District of Columbia.

The settlement, which was signed by the Court in April 2012, earmarked approximately $1.5 billion in payments for 2 million borrowers nationwide. The actual payment amount will depend upon the total number of borrowers who decide to participate. Payment checks are expected to be mailed in mid-2013.

Last week, the national settlement administrator mailed notification postcards to eligible borrowers across the nation. In California, packets containing a letter from the California Department of Justice, a claim form and answers to frequently asked questions are being mailed to eligible borrowers starting this week and continuing through October 12.

Eligible California borrowers should complete the claim form and return it as soon as possible in the envelope provided, or file the claim form online at www.nationalmortgagesettlement.com. The deadline for all claims is January 18, 2013.

The one-page claim forms are simple to complete. Borrowers who have questions or need help filing a claim should contact the settlement administrator, toll-free, at 866-430-8358, or send questions by email to administrator@nationalmortgagesettlement.com. The information line is staffed Monday through Friday from 5 a.m. to 5 p.m. PST.

Eligible borrowers do not need to prove financial harm to receive a payment, nor do they give up their rights to pursue a lawsuit against their mortgage servicer or to participate in the Independent Foreclosure Review Process being conducted by federal bank regulators. More information about that program is available at www.independentforeclosurereview.com.

Eligible borrowers may receive payment from this settlement even if they participate in another foreclosure claims process. However, any payment received may reduce payments that a borrower may be eligible to receive in any other foreclosure claim process or legal proceeding.

Borrowers who believe they may qualify for a payment, but did not receive a notice because they have moved, should contact the settlement administrator, toll-free, at 866-430-8358, or send an updated address by email to administrator@nationalmortgagesettlement.com. The line is staffed Monday through Friday from 5 a.m. to 5 p.m. PST.

Attorney General Harris also is warning all homeowners to be aware of settlement-related scams. Do not provide personal information or pay money to anyone who calls or emails and claims to provide settlement-related assistance. The official claim form does not ask for personal financial information. If you believe someone is conducting a settlement-related scam, please file an online complaint with the Attorney General’s Public Inquiry Unit at http://oag.ca.gov/consumers/general.

The national settlement followed state and federal investigations, which alleged that the five mortgage servicers routinely signed foreclosure-related documents outside the presence of a notary public and without personal knowledge that the facts contained in the documents were correct. This civil law enforcement action also alleged that the servicers committed widespread errors and abuses in their foreclosure processes.

The settlement resulted in broad reform of the mortgage servicing process, as well as financial relief for borrowers who are still in their homes via direct loan modification relief, including principal reduction.

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Announces Largest Medi-Cal Settlement in California History

August 23, 2012
Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

SACRAMENTO -- Attorney General Kamala D. Harris today announced a $323.67 million settlement with a Los Angeles-based health maintenance organization over excess Medi-Cal and Medicare payments.

The settlement with SCAN Health Plan, Senior Care Action Network, and Scan Group (collectively known as SCAN), which provides health care and support services in Southern California to the elderly and disabled, constitutes the largest Medi-Cal recovery in the state’s history.

“Californians have lost millions of dollars that should have been going toward the health care of our most vulnerable citizens,” said Attorney General Harris. “This settlement will bring a significant amount of those funds back to the state when it is dearly needed, and I commend all of those involved in this action.”

The matter was initially investigated by the State Controller's Office.  The state Attorney General’s Bureau

of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse then commenced its own investigation in cooperation with the United

States Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles. The investigation was conducted with the assistance of the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), which administers the Medi-Cal program.

A small component of the settlement resolves certain federal Medicare allegations brought by James M. Swoben in a lawsuit filed in July 2009 in federal court in the Central District of California. Mr. Swoben is a former employee of SCAN.  The lawsuit was filed pursuant to the federal and state False Claims Acts, which provide that any person with information about a false claim can file a sealed lawsuit on behalf of the government to recover the government’s losses.

The federal government will be receiving $3.82 million for the Medicare portion of the settlement. For the Medi-Cal portion of the settlement, $319.85 million will be split between the federal government and California, with the federal government receiving $129.38 million and the state $190.47 million. 

The settlement resolves the state’s allegations that SCAN failed to provide contractually required financial information to DHCS, thereby impairing the department from revising capitation rates for SCAN.

“This settlement is a victory for the Medi-Cal beneficiaries we serve,” said DHCS Director Toby Douglas.

“Using the scarce resources available in the most efficient way possible is a top priority for the state. We will continue our ongoing efforts to strengthen programs that protect the integrity of Medi-Cal.”

A copy of the Third Amended Complaint and copies of the settlement agreement; Joint Notice of Election to Intervene in Part; and the Notice of Dismissal and Order Thereon are attached to the online version of this release at www.oag.ca.gov.