60 Day Notice 2005-00624

Withdraw Notice Add a Complaint Add a Settlement Add a Judgment

AG Number: 
2005-00624
Notice PDF: 
PDF icon 2005-00624.pdf
Date Filed: 
11/23/2005
Noticing Party: 
Russell Brimer
Alleged Violators: 
Hai Thanh Supermarket
H&T, LLC
Chemicals: 
Lead
Source: 
Ceramicware with exterior artwork

60-Day Notice Document

Civil Complaint
AG Number:
2005-00624
Complaint PDF: 
PDF icon 2005-00624C322.pdf
Date Filed:
02/01/2006
Case Name: 
Brimer v. Hai Thanh Supermarket
Court Name: 
San Francisco Superior Court
Court Docket Number: 
CGC-06-449075
Plaintiff: 
Russell Brimer
Plaintiff Attorney: 
Laralei S. Paras
Daniel Bornstein
Defendant: 
Hai Thanh Supermarket
H & T, LLC
Type of Claim: 
Failure to Warn
Relief Sought: 
Warning
Civil Penalty
Contact Name: 
Laralei S. Paras, Esq.
Contact Organization: 
Hirst & Chanler, LLP
Email Address:
laralei.paras@hirst-chanler.co
Address: 
2560 Ninth Street, Parker Plaza, Suite 214
City, State, Zip:
Berkeley, CA 94710
Phone Number:
(510) 848-8880
Fax Number:
(510) 848-8118
Comments: 
Settlement
AG Number:
2005-00624
Settlement PDF: 
PDF icon 2005-00624S217.pdf
Settlement Date:
04/06/2006
Case Name: 
Brimer v. Hai Thanh Supermarket
Court Name: 
San Francisco Superior Court
Court Docket Number: 
CGC-05-440811
Plaintiff: 
Russell Brimer
Plaintiff Attorney: 
Laralei S. Paras
Defendant: 
Hai Thanh Supermarket
H & T, LLC
Injunctive Relief: 
Prospective relief: reformulation and warnings
*Non-Contingent Civil Penalty:
$ 1,000.00
Attorney(s) Fees and Costs:
$ 24,500.00
Payment in Lieu of Penalty:
$ 5,000.00  (Settlement Costs to Morrison & Foerster)
Total Payments:
$ 30,500.00
Will settlement be submitted to court?
Yes
Contact Name: 
Laralei S. Paras, Esq.
Contact Organization: 
Hirst & Chanler, LLP
Email Address:
laralei.paras@hirst-chanler.co
Address: 
2560 Ninth Street, Parker Plaza, Suite 214
City, State, Zip:
berkeley, CA 94710
Phone Number:
(510) 848-8880
Fax Number:
(510) 848-8118
Comments: 
Defendant Hai Thanh Supermarket has opted-in to the Proposition 65 Consent Judgment in the matter of Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, Case No. CGC-05-440811.

* A non-contingent civil penalty is the civil penalty that must be paid pursuant to the settlement, regardless of future events or actions of the defendant. If a settlement includes a contingent penalty, the plaintiff should report the additional penalty amount when it becomes due.