The information on this page is intended to provide easy public access to some of the most commonly requested consent judgments filed by the Attorney General in litigation concerning Proposition 65.
- People v. 21st Century et al (multivitamins), pdf
- People v. 3M (antacids), pdf
- People v. Accu-tek (brss shell casings), pdf
- People v. Accumed, Inc (anti-diarreal), pdf
- People v. Ace Hardware (Power Tools), pdf
- People v. Aeromoter (Well Pumps), pdf
- People v. Albertsons, Inc. et al (crystalline silica), pdf
- People v. Alpro Alimentos Proteinicos (mexican candy), pdf
- People v. American Standard (faucets), pdf
- People v. Amvac Bio-Strip, Inc. (pest strips), pdf
- People v. Anchor Glass (lead air emissions), pdf
- People v. Andronicos (fish warning), pdf
- People v. APM Terminals (Diesel at LA and LB Ports), pdf
- People v. Ariens (small engines), pdf
- People v. Arkie Lures, et al (lead weights), pdf
- People v. AstroTurf , LLC (Artificial turf), pdf
- People v. Baccarat (leaded crystal decanters), pdf
- People v. Beaulieu Group, LLC, pdf
- People v. Burlington Coat Factory, et al Amended Consent Judgment (jewelry), pdf
- People v. Coca-Cola Company (Mexican soda bottles), pdf
- People v. Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up, Inc., (Mexican soda bottles), pdf
- People v. FieldTurf USA, Inc., pdf
- People v. Food Market Management and Reeds (Ginger Candy), pdf
- People v. Frito-Lay, Inc. et al (Frito-Lay, Inc.) (acrylamide in potato chips), pdf
- People v. GIB, LLC (Brazilian Blowout), pdf
- People v. Mattel, Inc., et al, Consent Judgment (toys), pdf
- People v. McDonalds (acrylamide) , pdf
- People v. Mondelez et al (Ginger Snaps), pdf
- People v. PepsiCo, Inc. (Mexican soda bottles), pdf
- People v. Snyder's of Hanover, Inc. et al (Snak King) (acrylamide), pdf
- People v. Warner-Lambert et al (1998) (calcium supplements & antacids), pdf
- People v. Warner-Lambert et al (2011 modification) (calcium supplements & antacids), pdf
- People v. Wedgwood et al (ceramic tableware and hollowware), pdf
