60 Day Notice 2013-00819

AG Number: 
2013-00819
Notice PDF: 
Date Filed: 
09/10/2013
Noticing Party: 
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc.
Alleged Violators: 
Rhee Bros., Inc.
Korean Farm, Inc.
Assi Super, Inc.
Chemicals: 
Lead
Source: 
Rice

60-Day Notice Document

Corrected Settlement
AG Number:
2013-00819
Settlement PDF: 
Settlement Date:
04/04/2023
Case Name: 
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. v. Mercado Latino, Inc.
Court Name: 
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Court Docket Number: 
BC553427
Plaintiff: 
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc.
Plaintiff Attorney: 
Reuben Yeroushalmi
Defendant: 
Korean Farm, Inc.
Rhee Bros, Inc.
Injunctive Relief: 
The injunctive relief set forth herein will mirror the injunctive relief as set out in the Consent Judgment between CAG and the California Rice Commission in the JCCP Action and the Consent Judgment between CAG and Defendant Mercado Latino, Inc. in the 2013 Action. After the Effective Date, Defendants shall not, without the warning referenced below, sell in California, offer for sale in California, or ship for sale in California any Rice unless the level of Lead contained therein does not exceed 56 parts per billion (“ppb”). For any Covered Products that exceeds 56 ppb for the Listed Chemical, that are sold in California, offered for sale in California, or shipped for sale in California after the Effective Date, Defendants must provide a Proposition 65 compliant warning for the Covered Products as set forth below. Nothing is intended herein to provide for a permanent warning on Defendants’ product if the concentration levels of Lead do not exceed 56 ppb. Any warning provided pursuant to this section shall be affixed to the packaging of, or directly on, the Covered Products, and be prominently placed with such conspicuousness as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices as to render it likely to be read and understood by an ordinary individual under customary conditions before purchase or use. The warning must be set off from other surrounding information, enclosed in a box. Where the packaging of the Covered Product includes consumer information as defined by California Code of Regulations title 27 §25600.1(c) in a language other than English, the warning must also be provided in that language in addition to English. Should Defendants sell any Covered Product through the internet, the warning will be posted in the manner provided for with respect to internet sales, as provided for in 27 CCR sections 25601 and 25602, as they may be subsequently amended. For any Covered Products still existing in the Defendants’ inventory as of the Effective Date, that will be sold, offered for sale, or shipped for sale, in California, Defendants shall place a Proposition 65 compliant warning on them, unless the Covered Products do not exceed their respective levels of Lead.
*Non-Contingent Civil Penalty:
$ 8,580.00
Attorney(s) Fees and Costs:
$ 85,000.00
Payment in Lieu of Penalty:
$ 6,420.00  (Defendants shall make a separate payment, in the amount of six thousand four hundred and twenty dollars ($6,420.00) as an additional settlement payment to “Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc.” pursuant to Health & Safety Code § 25249.7(b) and California Code of Regulations, Title 11 § 3203(d). Defendants will issue a separate check to CAG for the Additional Settlement Payment. CAG will use this payment as follows, eighty five percent (85%) for fees of investigation, purchasing and testing for Proposition 65 listed chemicals in various products, and for expert fees for evaluating exposures through various mediums, including but not limited to consumer product, occupational, and environmental exposures to Proposition 65 listed chemicals, and the cost of hiring, consulting and retaining experts who assist with the extensive scientific analysis necessary for those files in litigation and to offset the costs of future litigation enforcing Proposition 65 but excluding attorney fees; fifteen percent (15%) for administrative costs incurred during investigation and litigation to reduce the public’s exposure to Proposition 65 listed chemicals by notifying those persons and/or entities believed to be responsible for such exposures and attempting to persuade those persons and/or entities to reformulate their products or the source of exposure to completely eliminate or lower the level of Proposition 65 listed chemicals including but not limited to costs of documentation and tracking of products investigated, storage of products, website enhancement and maintenance, computer and software maintenance, investigative equipment, CAG’s member’s time for work done on investigations, office supplies, mailing supplies and postage. Within 30 days of a request from the Attorney General, CAG shall provide to the Attorney General copies of documentation demonstrating how the above funds have been spent. CAG shall be solely responsible for ensuring the proper expenditure of such additional settlement payment.)
Total Payments:
$ 100,000.00
Will settlement be submitted to court?
Yes
Contact Name: 
Reuben Yeroushalmi
Contact Organization: 
Yeroushalmi & Yeroushalmi Law Firm
Email Address:
admin@Yeroushalmi.com
Address: 
9100 Wilshire Blvd 240w
City, State, Zip:
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Phone Number:
(310) 623-1926
Comments: 
Settlement also pertains to AG #2020-02202
Settlement
AG Number:
2013-00819
Settlement PDF: 
Settlement Date:
01/13/2023
Case Name: 
Proposition 65 Rice Product Cases
Court Name: 
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Court Docket Number: 
21STCV01324 (in JCCP4816)
Plaintiff: 
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc
Plaintiff Attorney: 
Reuben Yeroushalmi
Defendant: 
Rhee Bros., Inc.
Korean Farm., Inc.
Injunctive Relief: 
The injunctive relief set forth herein will mirror the injunctive relief as set out in the Consent Judgment between CAG and the California Rice Commission in the JCCP Action and the Consent Judgment between CAG and Defendant Mercado Latino, Inc. in the 2013 Action. After the Effective Date, Defendants shall not, without the warning referenced below, sell in California, offer for sale in California, or ship for sale in California any Rice unless the level of Lead contained therein does not exceed 56 parts per billion (“ppb”). 3.5 For any Covered Products that exceeds 56 ppb for the Listed Chemical, that are sold in California, offered for sale in California, or shipped for sale in California after the Effective Date, Defendants must provide a Proposition 65 compliant warning for the Covered Products as set forth below. Nothing is intended herein to provide for a permanent warning on Defendants’ product if the concentration levels of Lead do not exceed 56 ppb. Any warning provided pursuant to this section shall be affixed to the packaging of, or directly on, the Covered Products, and be prominently placed with such conspicuousness as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices as to render it likely to be read and understood by an ordinary individual under customary conditions before purchase or use. The warning must be set off from other surrounding information, enclosed in a box. Where the packaging of the Covered Product includes consumer information as defined by California Code of Regulations title 27 §25600.1(c) in a language other than English, the warning must also be provided in that language in addition to English. For any Covered Products still existing in the Defendants’ inventory as of the Effective Date, that will be sold, offered for sale, or shipped for sale, in California, Defendants shall place a Proposition 65 compliant warning on them, unless the Covered Products do not exceed their respective levels of Lead.
*Non-Contingent Civil Penalty:
$ 8,580.00
Attorney(s) Fees and Costs:
$ 85,000.00
Payment in Lieu of Penalty:
$ 6,420.00  (Defendants shall make a separate payment, in the amount of six thousand four hundred and twenty dollars ($6,420.00) as an additional settlement payment to “Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc.” pursuant to Health & Safety Code § 25249.7(b) and California Code of Regulations, Title 11 § 3203(d). Defendants will issue a separate check to CAG for the Additional Settlement Payment. CAG will use this payment as follows, eighty five percent (85%) for fees of investigation, purchasing and testing for Proposition 65 listed chemicals in various products, and for expert fees for evaluating exposures through various mediums, including but not limited to consumer product, occupational, and environmental exposures to Proposition 65 listed chemicals, and the cost of hiring, consulting and retaining experts who assist with the extensive scientific analysis necessary for those files in litigation and to offset the costs of future litigation enforcing Proposition 65 but excluding attorney fees; fifteen percent (15%) for administrative costs incurred during investigation and litigation to reduce the public’s exposure to Proposition 65 listed chemicals by notifying those persons and/or entities believed to be responsible for such exposures and attempting to persuade those persons and/or entities to reformulate their products or the source of exposure to completely eliminate or lower the level of Proposition 65 listed chemicals including but not limited to costs of documentation and tracking of products investigated, storage of products, website enhancement and maintenance, computer and software maintenance, investigative equipment, CAG’s member’s time for work done on investigations, office supplies, mailing supplies and postage. Within 30 days of a request from the Attorney General, CAG shall provide to the Attorney General copies of documentation demonstrating how the above funds have been spent. CAG shall be solely responsible for ensuring the proper expenditure of such additional settlement payment.)
Total Payments:
$ 100,000.00
Will settlement be submitted to court?
Yes
Contact Name: 
Reuben Yeroushalmi
Contact Organization: 
Yeroushalmi & Yeroushalmi Law Firm
Email Address:
admin@Yeroushalmi.com
Address: 
9100 Wilshire Blvd 240w
City, State, Zip:
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Phone Number:
(310) 623-1926
Comments: 
Settlement also pertains to AG #2020-02202
Judgment
AG Number:
2013-00819
Judgment PDF: 
Judgment Date:
06/15/2023
Settlement reported to AG: 
Mon, 06/05/2023
Case Name: 
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
Court Name: 
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Court Docket Number: 
21STCV01324
Plaintiff: 
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc.
Plaintiff Attorney: 
Reuben Yeroushalmi
Defendant: 
Korean Farm, Inc.
Rhee Bros, Inc.
Injunctive Relief: 
3.1 The injunctive relief set forth herein will mirror the injunctive relief as set out in the Consent Judgment between CAG and the California Rice Commission in the JCCP Action and the Consent Judgment between CAG and Defendant Mercado Latino, Inc. in the 2013 Action. After the Effective Date, Defendants shall not, without the warning referenced below, sell in California, offer for sale in California, or ship for sale in California any Rice unless the level of Lead contained therein does not exceed 56 parts per billion (“ppb”). 3.2 For any Covered Products that exceeds 56 ppb for the Listed Chemical, that are sold in California, offered for sale in California, or shipped for sale in California after the Effective Date, Defendants must provide a Proposition 65 compliant warning for the Covered Products as set forth below. Nothing is intended herein to provide for a permanent warning on Defendants’ product if the concentration levels of Lead do not exceed 56 ppb. Any warning provided pursuant to this section shall be affixed to the packaging of, or directly on, the Covered Products, and be prominently placed with such conspicuousness as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices as to render it likely to be read and understood by an ordinary individual under customary conditions before purchase or use. The warning must be set off from other surrounding information, enclosed in a box. Where the packaging of the Covered Product includes consumer information as defined by California Code of Regulations title 27 §25600.1(c) in a language other than English, the warning must also be provided in that language in addition to English. Should Defendants sell any Covered Product through the internet, the warning will be posted in the manner provided for with respect to internet sales, as provided for in 27 CCR sections 25601 and 25602, as they may be subsequently amended. The Parties agree that the following warning language shall constitute compliance with Proposition 65 with respect to the alleged Lead, in the Covered Products sold, offered for sale, or shipped for sale in California by Defendants after the Effective Date: WARNING: Consuming this product can expose you to chemicals including Lead, which is known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. For more information go to www.P65Warnings.ca.gov/food. 3.3 For any Covered Products still existing in the Defendants’ inventory as of the Effective Date, that will be sold, offered for sale, or shipped for sale, in California, Defendants shall place a Proposition 65 compliant warning on them, unless the Covered Products do not exceed their respective levels of Lead. 3.4 Defendants may use the short form warning language to sell through the Covered Products that exceeds 56ppb of Lead for 120 days after the Effective Date. The language of the warning will be as follows: WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm - www.P65Warnings.ca.gov After 120 days Defendants shall only use the long form warning as specified in Paragraph 3.2 above for Covered Products that exceeds 56ppb of Lead.
*Non-Contingent Civil Penalty:
$ 8,580.00
Attorney(s) Fees and Costs:
$ 85,000.00
Payment in Lieu of Penalty:
$ 6,420.00  (Defendants shall make a separate payment, in the amount of six thousand four hundred and twenty dollars ($6,420.00) as an additional settlement payment to “Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc.” pursuant to Health & Safety Code § 25249.7(b) and California Code of Regulations, Title 11 § 3203(d). Defendants will issue a separate check to CAG for the Additional Settlement Payment. CAG will use this payment as follows, eighty five percent (85%) for fees of investigation, purchasing and testing for Proposition 65 listed chemicals in various products, and for expert fees for evaluating exposures through various mediums, including but not limited to consumer product, occupational, and environmental exposures to Proposition 65 listed chemicals, and the cost of hiring, consulting and retaining experts who assist with the extensive scientific analysis necessary for those files in litigation and to offset the costs of future litigation enforcing Proposition 65 but excluding attorney fees; fifteen percent (15%) for administrative costs incurred during investigation and litigation to reduce the public’s exposure to Proposition 65 listed chemicals by notifying those persons and/or entities believed to be responsible for such exposures and attempting to persuade those persons and/or entities to reformulate their products or the source of exposure to completely eliminate or lower the level of Proposition 65 listed chemicals including but not limited to costs of documentation and tracking of products investigated, storage of products, website enhancement and maintenance, computer and software maintenance, investigative equipment, CAG’s member’s time for work done on investigations, office supplies, mailing supplies and postage. Within 30 days of a request from the Attorney General, CAG shall provide to the Attorney General copies of documentation demonstrating how the above funds have been spent. CAG shall be solely responsible for ensuring the proper expenditure of such additional settlement payment.)
Total Payments:
$ 100,000.00
Is Judgment Pursuant to Settlement?
Yes
Contact Name: 
Reuben Yeroushalmi
Contact Organization: 
Yeroushalmi & Yeroushalmi Law Firm
Email Address:
admin@Yeroushalmi.com
Address: 
9100 Wilshire Blvd 240w
City, State, Zip:
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Phone Number:
(310) 623-1926


* A non-contingent civil penalty is the civil penalty that must be paid pursuant to the settlement, regardless of future events or actions of the defendant. If a settlement includes a contingent penalty, the plaintiff should report the additional penalty amount when it becomes due.