Case Name:
Hammond v GMA ACCESSORIES INC. D/B/A CAPELLI NEW YORK
Plaintiff Attorney:
Joseph D. Agliozzo, Law Corporation
Defendant:
GMA Accessories Inc. d/b/a Capelli New Yorkj
Injunctive Relief:
3.1. Effective on and after the Effective Date GMA shall not sell the Covered Product
for distribution in California unless the product is a “Reformulated Covered
Products” as defined in Paragraph 3.2 or unless GMA provides a Compliant
Warning as defined in Paragraph 3.3 for any non-reformulated Covered Product
that it sells in California. Compliance with this Settlement Agreement by GMA
shall constitute compliance under Proposition 65 with regard to any Covered
Product sold, offered for sale, imported, manufactured or otherwise distributed
after the Effective Date.
3.2. For purposes of this Settlement Agreement, a “Reformulated Covered Product” is
a Covered Product containing no more than 1,000 parts per million (0.1%) DEHP,
butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), di-isodecyl phthalate (DIDP), diisononyl phthalate (DINP), or di-n-hexyl phthalate (DnHP) in any
accessible component (“accessible component” is defined as any component that
could be touched by a person during reasonably foreseeable use). In order to
determine compliance with this reformulation standard, GMA may rely on third
party testing from an accredited laboratory.
Address:
1601 N. Sepulveda Boulevard, 649
