# |
Document Name |
Date of Event |
1. |
OAL Amended Notice of Approval in Part and Withdrawal in Part |
August 27, 2020 |
2. |
Final Text of Regulations [UPDATED] |
August 14, 2020 |
|
WWW Consortium, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, version 2.1 (June 5, 2018). [Incorporated by Reference] |
|
3. |
Addendum to Final Statement of Reasons |
August 14, 2020 |
4. |
Final Statement of Reasons |
June 1, 2020 |
|
Appendix A. Summary and Response to Comments Submitted during 45-Day Period |
|
|
Appendix B. List of Commenters from 45-Day Period |
|
|
Appendix C. Summary and Response to Comments Submitted during 1st 15-Day Period |
|
|
Appendix D. List of Commenters from 1st 15-Day Period |
|
|
Appendix E. Summary and Response to Comments Submitted during 2nd 15-Day Period |
|
|
Appendix F. List of Commenters from 2nd 15-Day Period |
|
5. |
Form 400 – Endorsed and Filed Version [Updated] |
August 14, 2020 |
6. |
Updated Informative Digest |
June 1, 2020 |
7. |
Written Justification for Earlier Effective Date and Request for Expedited Review |
June 1, 2020 |
8. |
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking |
October 11, 2019 |
9. |
Original Proposed Regulations |
October 11, 2019 |
10. |
Initial Statement of Reasons (ISOR), includes Appendices A, B |
October 11, 2019 |
11. |
Statement of Mailing First 45-Day Notice |
May 27, 2020 |
12. |
First Notice of Modifications |
February 10, 2020 |
13. |
First Modified Regulations |
February 10, 2020 |
14. |
Statement of Mailing First 15-Day Notice |
May 27, 2020 |
15. |
Second Notice of Modifications |
March 27, 2020 |
16. |
Second Modified Regulations |
March 27, 2020 |
17. |
Statement of Mailing Second 15-Day Notice |
May 27, 2020 |
18. |
Public Comments
Note: The comments are marked up based on each commenter and their comments.
|
|
45 Day Written Comments |
Comment Period Ended: December 6, 2019 |
|
First Set 15 Day Written Comments |
Comment Period Ended: February 25, 2020 |
|
Second Set 15 Day Written Comments |
Comment Period Ended: March 27, 2020 |
19. |
Public Hearing Transcripts
Note: The transcripts of the public hearings are marked up based on each commenter and their comments.
|
|
Sacramento |
December 2, 2019 |
|
Los Angeles |
December 3, 2019 |
|
San Francisco |
December 4, 2019 |
|
Fresno |
December 5, 2019 |
20. |
Form 399 |
|
21. |
Materials/Documents Relied Upon |
Appendix A: Preliminary Activities |
|
California Department of Justice, Attorney General’s Office, California Data Breach Report (February 2016). |
|
|
California Department of Justice, Attorney General’s Office, Public Comments Received as Part of the Preliminary Rulemaking Process. |
|
|
California Department of Justice, Attorney General’s Office, Supplemental Public Comments Received as Part of the Preliminary Rulemaking Process |
|
|
California Department of Justice, Attorney General’s Office, Transcript of Fresno Public Forum. |
February 13, 2019 |
|
California Department of Justice, Attorney General’s Office, Transcript of Inland Empire/Riverside Public Forum. |
January 24, 2019 |
|
California Department of Justice, Attorney General’s Office, Transcript of Los Angeles Public Forum. |
January 25, 2019 |
|
California Department of Justice, Attorney General’s Office, Transcript of Sacramento Public Forum. |
February 5, 2019 |
|
California Department of Justice, Attorney General’s Office, Transcript of San Diego Public Forum. |
January 14, 2019 |
|
California Department of Justice, Attorney General’s Office, Transcript of San Francisco Public Forum. |
January 8, 2019 |
|
California Department of Justice, Attorney General’s Office, Transcript of Stanford Public Forum. |
March 5, 2019 |
Appendix B: 45-Day Period |
|
Acquisti et al., What Is Privacy Worth? (2013) The Journal of Legal Studies, 42(2), pp. 249-274. |
|
|
Center for Plain Language, Privacy-policy analysis (2015). |
|
|
Federal Trade Commission, Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers, FTC Report (March 2012). |
|
|
Hahn et al., A data processing addendum for the CCPA? (Jun. 19, 2019) IAPP Privacy Perspectives. |
|
|
Montes et al., The value of personal information in markets with endogenous privacy (Aug. 5, 2015) CEIS Working Paper No. 352. |
|
|
National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Short Form Notice Code of Conduct to Promote Transparency in Mobile App Practices (July 25, 2013). |
|
|
Norton, The Non-Contractual Nature of Privacy Policies and a New Critique of the Notice and Choice Privacy Protection Model (2016) 27 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 181. |
|
|
Pew Research Center, Public Perceptions of Privacy and Security in the Post-Snowden Era (November 14, 2014). |
|
|
Reidenberg et al., Ambiguity in Privacy Policies and the Impact of Regulation (March 22, 2016) Journal of Legal Studies, Forthcoming; Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2715164. |
|
|
Schaub, et al., A Design Space for Effective Privacy Notices (July 22–24, 2015) Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2015, Ottawa, Canada. |
|
|
Short et al., What’s Your Data Worth? (Mar. 3, 2017) MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring 2017 Issue. |
|
|
Spiekermann, et al., Towards a Value Theory for Personal Data (April 2017) Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 32, Issue 1, 2017. |
|
Appendix C: 15-Day Period |
|
Accenture Interactive, See people, not patterns. (2019). |
|
|
Cranor, et al., Design and Evaluation of a Usable Icon and Tagline to Signal an Opt-Out of the Sale of Personal Information as Required by CCPA (February 4, 2020). |
|
|
Douglis, et al., How the CCPA impacts civil litigation (January 28, 2020). |
|
|
Duffy, et al., Retail Loyalty Programs Will Survive Calif. Privacy Law (September 26, 2019), Law360 |
|
|
Paternoster, Leon, Getting round GDPR with dark patters. A case study: Techradar (August 12, 2018). |
|
|
Simon, et al., Summary of Key Findings from California Privacy Survey (October 16, 2019), Goodwin Simon Strategic Research. |
|